RentInSA
Menu

For landlords & investors

The Texas Repair Duty Under § 92.052: What Landlords Must Do After a Tenant's Written Notice

Chapter 92 of the Texas Property Code sets a short clock and a steep remedy ladder for landlords who ignore repair requests. Here is exactly what triggers the duty, what a reasonable response looks like, and where Bexar County landlords get burned.

6 min read · November 4, 2026

Under Texas Property Code § 92.052, a landlord must make a diligent effort to repair any condition that materially affects the physical health or safety of an ordinary tenant once the tenant has given proper notice, is not delinquent in rent, and the condition was not caused by the tenant or their guests. That duty is not optional, cannot be waived in most cases, and triggers a seven-day presumption of unreasonableness under § 92.056 if ignored. Miss the window and the tenant can terminate the lease, repair and deduct, sue for actual damages plus one month's rent plus $500, and recover attorney's fees.

Most landlord losses in Bexar County JP court on repair claims are not close calls. They are landlords who treated a written repair request like a service ticket and discovered too late that Chapter 92 had already started running.

What actually triggers the duty

Three conditions must line up before § 92.052 applies:

  • The tenant gave notice of the condition (written, in most cases — more on the exception below).
  • The tenant is not delinquent in rent at the time notice is given. Current rent, not perfect rent history.
  • The condition was not caused by the tenant, a lawful occupant, a family member, or a guest — and the condition materially affects the physical health or safety of an ordinary tenant.

That last phrase is the whole ballgame. A dripping faucet is not a § 92.052 condition. A gas leak, no hot water in January, raw sewage backup, a non-functioning AC when outdoor highs are in the 90s (which in San Antonio is roughly April through October), a broken exterior door lock, a roof leak over a bedroom, mold intrusion, or an inoperable smoke alarm all are. The statute does not list conditions; the standard is functional.

The written notice rule — and the one exception

§ 92.052(d) requires the tenant's notice to be in writing if the lease is in writing and the lease specifically states that notice must be in writing and is in underlined or bold print. If your lease does not meet that specificity test, oral notice counts. The TAA residential lease handles this correctly; a lot of homemade and investor-template leases do not.

The exception: a tenant does not need to send a second written notice if they already gave one notice (written or oral) and the landlord received it. Read that carefully. One properly delivered notice is enough to start the clock, and a follow-up text message or voicemail preserves the tenant's remedies even if your lease demands writing.

Save everything. Email timestamps, portal tickets, voicemails, text threads, certified mail green cards. In a § 92.0563 damages suit, the tenant has to prove notice; you want a parallel record so you can prove response.

The seven-day presumption under § 92.056

§ 92.056(d) presumes that seven days is a reasonable time to repair or remedy a condition. The presumption is rebuttable — you can show it was unreasonable given the nature of the problem, the reasonable availability of materials and labor, and utility company delays — but you carry that burden. A full HVAC compressor replacement in July when every San Antonio HVAC company is 10 days out is defensible if you documented the calls. A broken garbage disposal you ignored for two weeks because you were busy is not.

The clock starts when you receive notice, not when you dispatch a vendor. "I called my guy" is not a repair. The condition has to actually be remedied, or you have to show diligent effort and a reasonable explanation for the delay.

The remedy ladder if you miss the window

Once the landlord fails to act diligently, § 92.056(b) opens the door. The tenant may do any of the following without giving up the others:

  • Terminate the lease under § 92.056(f) and move out, with a pro-rated refund of rent and the full security deposit.
  • Repair and deduct under § 92.0561, within statutory dollar caps (one month's rent or $500, whichever is greater, with higher caps in specific utility and sewer scenarios) after a second written notice.
  • Sue in JP or county court under § 92.0563 for a court order directing the repair, a reduction in rent, actual damages, one month's rent plus $500, court costs, and attorney's fees.

Attorney's fees is the number that turns a $400 water heater into a $6,000 judgment. Bexar County JP courts (all four precincts, filed through eFileTexas) hear these cases routinely and are not sympathetic to landlords who sat on written notice.

Conditions you cannot push onto the tenant

§ 92.006 restricts what you can waive. Health and safety repair obligations under § 92.052 generally cannot be waived by lease language, with narrow exceptions requiring specific underlined or bold text and, in some cases, actual knowledge and a signed agreement. The common landlord move of "tenant is responsible for all repairs under $200" does not override § 92.052 for health-and-safety items. It may allocate cosmetic repair cost; it does not let you ignore a broken furnace.

Smoke alarms sit in their own subchapter (§§ 92.251–.262). You cannot shift installation, inspection, or battery-replacement duty to the tenant by lease provision except in the narrow way the statute allows, and a missing or inoperable alarm at move-in is independently actionable.

Security devices — keyed deadbolts, keyless deadbolts, window latches, sliding door locks — are governed by Subchapter D (§§ 92.151–.170). Rekeying is required within seven days of a new tenant taking possession (§ 92.156). Missed, this becomes its own damages claim separate from § 92.052.

What most landlords get wrong

  • Treating texts as not-notice. A tenant text that says "AC is out, it's 94 inside" is notice. The clock started. Responding three days later with "please submit a work order in the portal" does not reset it.
  • Requiring rent-current as a prerequisite — but miscounting. The tenant only has to be current on the date notice is given. If they pay rent on the 3rd and send notice on the 4th, you cannot defeat the claim by showing they were late last month.
  • Dispatching without documenting. If your HVAC vendor says it will be 11 days for a compressor, get that in writing. Your file needs to show you acted within hours and that the delay was outside your control.
  • Blaming the tenant without proof. "They clogged the main line" is an affirmative defense you have to prove. A plumber's invoice noting wipes or grease in the line is evidence. A hunch is not.
  • Ignoring the second-notice cutoff for repair-and-deduct. § 92.0561 requires the tenant to send a second notice after the reasonable time has passed before they can self-help. If you fix it before the second notice ripens, you are usually safe from a deduct claim — but not from a damages claim.
  • Retaliating. § 92.331 prohibits raising rent, terminating, or decreasing services within six months of a good-faith repair request. Non-renewing a tenant who filed a repair complaint three months ago is a § 92.333 civil penalty of one month's rent plus $500 per violation, plus attorney's fees.

A workable response protocol

For every reported condition, within 24 hours: log the notice with timestamp and medium, acknowledge in writing to the tenant, triage whether it is a health-and-safety item, and if so dispatch a vendor the same business day. Keep the tenant updated in writing every 48 hours until the condition is remedied. If the fix will exceed seven days, send a written explanation naming the vendor, the parts delay, and the expected completion date before day seven, not after.

Store the full paper trail — notice, acknowledgment, vendor dispatch, invoices, completion confirmation — in one place per unit. If a tenant ever files in JP court, you will produce it in the order a judge reads.

When to call a lawyer

Any repair claim that involves mold, sewage, lead paint in a pre-1978 structure, a child's injury, or a tenant who has already sent a lease-termination notice under § 92.056(f) is not a DIY response. Call a Texas attorney who handles landlord-tenant work before you reply. The cost of one hour of advice is a rounding error against a § 92.0563 judgment with fees.

If you are a Bexar County landlord looking to tighten the gap between repair requests and compliant response, or you need to get a vacant unit back on the market quickly, you can list a rental free at RentInSA's /list-your-home page, review current comparable asking rents against our active inventory, and browse the broader landlord resources at /resources.

texas property codebexar countychapter 92landlord compliancerepair dutysection 92.052

Browse rentals on RentInSA

More in Texas Landlord–Tenant LawSee all 7 →